Cases 31 - 40 of 132
FanFan v. M.C.C. et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Defendant:
MLP Y Joaquin, MD. Robert Beaudouin, Dr. Daniel Kaufman and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy FanFan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Antinelli et al
as 5:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Michael Collier
Defendant:
Medical Administrator, F.B.O.P Directors Office, St. Tammy Parish Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSS v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2020cv18895
Defendant:
MRS. KOSNER, DAVE ORTIZ, MR. EVENDGER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv18900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS and KEVIN ROSS
Defendant:
F.B.O.P AT FORT DIX and DAVE E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. ORTIZ et al
as 3:2020cv18900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS
Defendant:
F.B.O.P AT FORT DIX and DAVE E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Mutawakkil v. Andrews et al
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant:
J Andrews, Erika Young and F.B.O.P-Health Services
Plaintiff:
Hanif K. Al-Mutawakkil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Mutawakkil v. Andrews et al
as 7:2020cv00679
Defendant:
Erika Young, J. Andrews and F.B.O.P-Health Services
Plaintiff:
Hanif K. Al-Mutawakkil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galindez v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2020cv03859
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Romero Galindez
Defendant:
Faisal Ahmed, F.B.O.P and K Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowman v. Sawyer, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
J.E. KRUEGER, Regional Director, North Central Regional Office F.B.O.P., BRAD GRELICK, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Englewood, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Interim Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH F. BOWMAN
Kipper King v. F.B.O.P. Medical Department
as 20-6634
Defendant / Appellee:
F.B.O.P. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and THE DIRECTOR OF THE F.B.O.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIPPER KEN KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
