Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Wilks v. Warden of FCI Schuylkill
as 1:2012cv01355
Petitioner:
Altimont M. Wilks
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Hufford
as 11-3489
Petitioner - Appellant:
John D. Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, Howard L. Hufford, Warden, FCI Schuylkill and F.C.I. Schuylkill
Respondent - Appellee:
Queens County District Attorney's Office and New York State Attorney General's Office
Bayard v. Hufford
as 10-2311
Petitioner - Appellant:
SERGE ERIC BAYARD
Respondent - Appellee:
H.L. HUFFORD, FCI Schuylkill, Warden
Bayard v. FCI Schuylkill, Warden
as 1:2010cv00442
Petitioner:
Serge Eric Bayard
Respondent:
FCI Schuylkill, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: In Re: James Baker, III
as 10-1497
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES BAKER, III
Defendant - Respondent:
T. R. SNIEZEK, Warden, FCI Schuylkill
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MALCOLM MUIR
Roger Jackman v. USA, et al
as 09-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Jackman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Management and Policy Makers, Bureau of Prisons, Management and Policy Makers and others
Ceasar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00862
Petitioner:
Maurice Ceasar
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Schuylkill, R. A. Kranzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ceasar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00669
Petitioner:
Maurice Ceasar
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Schuylkill, ISM Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Piquin-George v. Warden, et al
as 09-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. DALEY, JR., AKA John T. Piquin-George
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Schuylkill and THE HEALTH ADMN DEPT
Riches v. FCI Schuylkill
as 1:2008cv00354
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
FCI Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
