Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00194
Plaintiff:
Global Naps, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 5:2010mc00166
Plaintiff:
Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc. and Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
as 5:2010mc00022
Plaintiff:
Global Naps, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc.
Receiver:
Carl F. Jenkins
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England Inc.
as 3:2010mc00007
Plaintiff:
Global NAPS, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England Inc.
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 2:2010mc00008
Plaintiff:
Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Receiver:
Carl F. Jenkins
Gangi et al v. United States
as 1:2010mc10160
Petitioner:
Frank Gangi , Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd. , BABP VI LLC and others
Respondent:
United States
Movant:
South Coastal Bank
Gangi et al v. United States of America
as 6:2010cv01138
Petitioner:
Frank Gangi , Global NAPS, Inc. and BABP VI, LLC
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Gangi et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010mc10148
Plaintiff:
Frank Gangi , Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd. , BABP VI LLC and others
Defendant:
United States of America
GANGI et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2010mc00024
Petitioner:
FRANK GANGI, FRANK GANGI, FERROUS MINER HOLDINGS LTD and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Vermont Public Service Board et al
as 2:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Global NAPS, Inc.
Defendant:
Vermont Public Service Board, James Volz and David C. Coen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
