Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Holt v. Arkansas, State of
as 3:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Garry Paul Holt
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garris v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2015cv05308
Plaintiff:
Christian Garris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Bunton v. Stewart et al
as 4:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Ralph Bunton
Defendant:
Garry Stewart and Durwin Lasker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staton v. Emerson et al
as 5:2014cv05080
Plaintiff:
Garry Staton
Defendant:
Kim Emerson, M.D. , Emerson Group, P.A. and Eureka Springs Hospital Homecare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaty v. Stewart et al
as 4:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Christopher Beaty
Defendant:
Garry Stewart and Pat Winter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quality Petroleum Inc v. Austin et al
as 4:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Quality Petroleum Inc
Defendant:
Larry Austin , Garry Austin and Crown Lubricants Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Harris v. Gebremichael et al
as 4:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Garry Harris
Defendant:
Samuel Gebremichael , 2206918 Ontario Inc and Shaan Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Garris v. J B Hunt Transport Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Charlene Garris
Defendant:
J B Hunt Transport Inc , J B Hunt Transport Services Inc , J B Hunt Logistics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clayton et al v. Batesville Casket Company Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Garry Clayton and Zelma Magby
Defendant:
Batesville Casket Company Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fourte v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2011cv00726
Plaintiff:
Broderick Fourte
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Karl Byrd, John Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
