Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Leslie Smith v. R. Diaz
as 13-15651
Petitioner - Appellant:
LESLIE GORDON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
R. DIAZ, Warden
Pasquale Pucella, et al v. Becky Smith, et al
as 12-17433
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PASQUALE PUCELLA and MICHELA AFFLITTO
Defendant:
SONOMA COFFEE CAFE LLC, RONALD WERMES and EQUIPMENT AND BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
BECKY SMITH and GORDON SMITH
Gari Media Group, Inc., et al v. Gordon Smith
as 12-56774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARI MEDIA GROUP, INC. and FRANK GARI, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON SMITH, an individual
Smith et al v. Gari Media Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01078
Plaintiff:
Gordon Smith and Cindy Smith
Defendant:
Gari Media Group, Inc. , Frank Gari and Larry McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pucella et al v. Sonoma Coffee Cafe LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Pasquale Pucella and Michela Afflitto
Defendant:
Sonoma Coffee Cafe LLC, Ronald Wermes, Equipment and Business Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Smith v. Diaz
as 3:2012cv00688
Petitioner:
Leslie Gordon Smith
Respondent:
R. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gari Media Group Inc et al v. Gordon Smith
as 2:2012cv00556
Plaintiff:
Frank Gari and Gari Media Group Inc
Defendant:
Gordon Smith
Frank Gari Productions Inc et al v. Gordon Smith
as 2:2012cv00248
Petitioner:
Frank Gari Productions Inc, Frank Gari and Gari Communications Inc
Respondent:
Gordon Smith
George's Place, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv01096
Plaintiff:
George's Place, LLC and Margaret K. Hocter
Defendant:
Gordon Smith and Several Unknown Bradford County Deputy Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Gordon-Smith
as 11-4079
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Vega, Jr. and Francis Rowe, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Gordon-Smith and Gordon-Smith Contracting, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
