Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Hudson v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
Harvey J Hudson
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., District of Columbia, Harley G Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENDLETON v. ROZUM
as 3:2010cv00147
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Michael Pendleton
as 10-2312
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA and DA OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
In re: In Re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 10-1608
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant - Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM and ATTY GEN PA
PENDLETON v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00027
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia et al v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00334
Defendant:
LCS Corrections Services, Inc., LCS Corrections Services, Inc., Miguel A Niderhauser and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Garcia and Monica Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
In re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 09-3221
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALGHNY
PENDLETON v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00175
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 09-2407
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALGHNY
PENDLETON v. A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2009cv64622
Plaintiff:
RENNIE J PENDLETON and RENNIE J PENDLETON
Defendant:
A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
