Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Rodgers v. Aguirre et al
as 5:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
Dicey Rodgers
Defendant:
Jose Feliciano Aguirre, Bill Lancaster and Kiowa County Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguirre v. City of Elgin, Texas et al
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Aguirre
Defendant:
City of Elgin, Texas and Elgin Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguirre-Ganceda v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv05065
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Aguirre-Ganceda
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Rivera-Cotton et al
as 3:2015cv01116
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jose Juan Rivera-Cotton, Aida Luz Aguirre-del-Valle, Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Antonio Aguirre-Sanchez, et al v. Webb's Seafood Inc.
as 14-14579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO AGUIRRE-SANCHEZ, JOSE GUADALUPE AGUIRRE-SANCHEZ, JOSE DEJESUS MANDUJANO-PAREDES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WEBB'S SEAFOOD INC.
Jose Aguirre-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72570
Petitioner:
JOSE ALBERTO AGUIRRE-PEREZ, AKA Jose Alberto Aguirre
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jose Aguirre-Palacio
as 14-55188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SIGIFREDO AGUIRRE-PALACIOS
Aguirre-Palacios v. USA
as 3:2013cv03199
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Sigifredo Aguirre-Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jose Aguirre v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72832
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS AGUIRRE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Aguirre-Pinzon v. United States Department of State et al
as 1:2013cv21182
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Aguirre-Pinzon
Defendant:
Secretary of the United States Department of States, United States Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
