Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Rosario et al v. Fiesta Cafe LLC et al
as 3:2021cv30065
Plaintiff:
Iesha Marie Crespo and Carissa Rosario
Defendant:
Fiesta Cafe LLC and Juan Montano
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Moscoso Mejia v. McCleary et al
as 1:2021cv10757
Plaintiff:
Juan Camilo Moscoso Mejia
Defendant:
ACT DIR USCIS Tracy RENAUD, District Director Michael J McCleary, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mailloux v. City of Leominster et al
as 4:2021cv40007
Defendant:
Juan D Ramos, Matthew J DiPerri and City of Leominster
Plaintiff:
Roger R Mailloux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jimenez Paulino et al v. Hatch Landscape and Design, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv12194
Defendant:
Jared Hatch, HATCH LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN, INC., a/k/a HATCH ASPHALT MANAGEMENT, THE HATCH GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Jimenez Paulino and Manuel Ceballos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Mouradian v. Torruella et al
as 1:2020cv11230
Defendant:
Judge Patti B. Saris, Judge David J. Barron, Judge Marianne B. Bowler and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Mouradian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bishay v. U.S. Court of Appeals
as 1:2019cv11731
Defendant:
Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, Maura Healey, U.S Courts of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
