Cases 31 - 40 of 251
MOLYNEUX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24241
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES MOLYNEUX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
FEUDALE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23217
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES FEUDALE, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrington v. White et al
as 8:2022cv02633
Defendant:
Brooke P. Boldin, Thomas White, Jim Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Lee Harrington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Copen, Sr. v. Tracy Harper
as 22-7109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE JAMES COPEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY HARPER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, STATE POLICE CORPRAL MILLER, State Trooper, TROOPER STALLING, State Trooper and others
Jesse Copen, Sr. v. Pam Daniels
as 22-7056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE JAMES COPEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAM DANIELS, DCR Employed?, ERIN LYNN, Parole Officers Supervisor, MISTY FLETCHER, DHHR Worker and others
Jones et al v. Jones County, MS et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Corbey Jones and Cynthia Ann Jones
Defendant:
Jones County, MS, Sheriff Joe Berlin, Deputy James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOHANNON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16627
Plaintiff:
JESSE JAMES BOHANNON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Copen SR. v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR.
Defendant:
Tracy Harper, State Police Corpral Miller, Trooper Stalling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
