Cases 31 - 40 of 268
Castillo v. Diallo, LLC, et al.
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jose Castillo
Defendant:
Diallo, LLC, Bocar Diallo, ABC Corporation (1-99) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALMEIDA et al v. WALMART INC. et al
as 3:2021cv19464
Plaintiff:
ISABEL ALMEIDA and JOAQUIM ALMEIDA
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES EAST I, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
STANBACK v. WISLER et al
as 3:2021cv19847
Plaintiff:
ABDUL M. STANBACK
Defendant:
BARRY A. WISLER, BORG FATHOM, DAVE RICHARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Harcrow v. Clyde Harcrow, et al
as 21-5943
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BETH HARCROW
Defendant / Appellee:
CLYDE HARCROW, JOHN DOES, 1-99, MILLERSVILLE, TN and others
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Does 1-99, SOTP Therapist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. MENDOZA et al
as 3:2021cv17399
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, OMAR MENDOZA, OFFICER YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRUNES et al v. LAFAYETTE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC et al
as 1:2021cv16691
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GRUNES and BRENDA MCBRIDE
Cross Claimant:
LAFAYETTE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC and CHRISTIAN POWELL
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1-99 and XYZ ENTITY #1-99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brady v. Breed et al
as 3:2021cv01583
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brady
Defendant:
Paul T. Breed, Matt Grimm, Anduril Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
CAPORALETTI v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2021cv03293
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CAPORALETTI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, MICHAEL MARKOVICH, MATTHEW MACIEJEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
