Cases 31 - 40 of 40
DARRAH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv05030
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. DARRAH , IAN ALLEN , TRAVIS FISHER and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv04136
Plaintiff:
Karl William Wright
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kitzmiller et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Karl William Kitzmiller and Alice Kitzmiller
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richard Karl Williams v. USA
as 3:2011cv00351
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Richard Karl Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kendall Tucker v. Karl William
as 10-3264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENDALL TUCKER
Defendant - Appellant:
KARL WILLIAMS, Deputy Sheriff of Fulton County, Illinois in his individual capacity
Kendall Tucker v. Fulton County, Illinois, et al
as 10-2835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENDALL TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FULTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS, an Illinois Local Government Entity, JEFF STANDARD, Sheriff of Fulton County, Illinois in his Official Capacity, KARL WILLIAMS, Deputy Sheriff of Fulton County, Illinois in his Individual Capacity and others
WILLIAMS v. CAMBURN et al
as 2:2010cv03690
Plaintiff:
KARL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RAYMOND CAMBURN, OFICERS JOHN DOE #1-2 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Egner v. Cole et al
as 3:2009cv01195
Plaintiff:
Karl William Egner
Defendant:
Thomas Jay Cole, John H. Rutherford, Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Fulton County Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv01164
Plaintiff:
Kendall Tucker
Defendant:
Fulton County Illinois, Jeff Standard and Karl . Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Karl Williams Inc v. Winamerica Inc
as 3:2007cv03204
Plaintiff:
Karl Williams Inc
Defendant:
Winamerica Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
