Cases 31 - 40 of 225
Karma Zelenenki, et al v. Knauf Gips KG, et al
as 23-10134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARMA ZELENENKI and MICHAEL ZELENENKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KNAUF GIPS KG and KNAUF PLASTERBOARD ( TIANJIN ) CO., LTD.
Sipkin v. DFS Karma, LLC
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Corey Sipkin
Defendant:
DFS Karma, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
The United States Playing Card Company v. Karmas Far, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04867
Plaintiff:
The United States Playing Card Company
Defendant:
Karmas Far, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Lightfeather v. Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card et al
as 8:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card, Vista Print Credit Pay Pal, Amazon Credit Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prasad v. Arnold et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
Dylon B. Arnold and Judge C. Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prasad v. Arnold et al
as 7:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
Dylon B. Arnold and Judge C. Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karma Automotive LLC v. de Vries et al
as 4:2022cv02644
Plaintiff:
Karma Automotive LLC
Defendant:
Joost de Vries, Alan Yuan, Troy Beetz and others
Prasad v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Sundari Karma Prasad
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02461
Plaintiff:
Karma Automotive LLC
Defendant:
Joost de Vries, Alan Yuan, Troy Beetz and others
In Re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al
as 5:2018md02834
Defendant:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al, Airbnb, Inc., Stitchfix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
