Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Campbell v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv01672
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Days Inn Worldwide Inc
as 3:2009cv00678
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Days Inn Worldwide Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Darron Campbell v. City of Tucson, et al
as 09-15736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRON KEITH CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, CHIEF OF POLICE, Tucson Police Department, TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Keith Campbell v. Figueroa et al
as 2:2008cv08201
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Figueroa, LA County and LA Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Campbell v. Figueroa et al
as 3:2008cv02251
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Figueroa, LA County and LA Police Dept
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv01857
Plaintiff:
Darron Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Dora Schriro and Herman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Darron Keith Campbell
Defendant:
City of Tucson, Chief of Police, Tucson Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00344
Petitioner:
Darron Keith Campbell
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00343
Petitioner:
Darron Keith Campbell
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Patton
as 0:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Keith Campbell
Defendant:
Brian Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
