Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Lewis v. Brown
as 4:2013cv00281
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gregory Lewis
Respondent:
Tamala Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Williams v. Aaron Sprague, et al
as 13-36000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SPRAGUE, Attorney, JUDY DOE, Oregon Dept of Corr Correctional Ombudsman, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General and others
Williams v. Hallman et al
as 2:2013cv00950
Defendant:
Prisoner Mohamed Ahmed, (EOCI) Asst. Supt. Bridgette Amsberry, BHS Counselor Anderson and others
OSP:
ODOC Health Serv. Mgr. Steve Shelton and Dr. John Vargo
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Williams v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 13-35232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, M.D., OLE HANSAN, Doctor, Oregon State Penitentiay, GREG ABBE, Intake Center Practitioner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Thompson v. USA
as 5:2012cv90128
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gregory Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 12-35091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVE SHELTON, M.D., STEVE GUNDERSON, PA and others
Stephens v. U S Airways Inc
as 5:2011cv01618
Defendant:
U S Airways Inc
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Kenneth Thompson
as 10-14852
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY THOMPSON
BEBOUT v. WOODY, et al
as 1:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GREGORY BEBOUT
Defendant:
ROBERT WOODY, JOHNS and WEEKLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
