Cases 31 - 40 of 266
Kline v. Brandon Aumiller & Assoc. et al
as 4:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Brandon Aumiller & Assoc. and Brandon Aumiller
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SNYDER v. KERTES et al
as 2:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
GREGG L. SYNDER and GREGG L. SNYDER
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN SEAN KERTES, VICE-CHAIRMAN DOUGLAS W. CHEW, SECRETARY GINA CERILLI-SLASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Federoff et al v. Geisinger Clinic et al
as 4:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Theodore Federoff, Christine Baron, Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWKEY v. CHEW et al
as 2:2021cv01339
Plaintiff:
HUGH JAMES HAWKEY, JR.
Defendant:
DOUGLAS CHEW, GINA CERILLI, SEAN KERTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CICCOTELLI v. INTERSECT ENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INTERSECT ENT, INC., KIERAN T GALLAHUE, THOMAS A WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North Park Family Dental
as 2:2021cv03728
Lead Plaintiff:
North Park Family Dental
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as METLIFE and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE F. KLINE, D.M.D.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
JOHNSTON v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD JOHNSTON, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE LOWTHER, ERIC SCHWARTZ and BRIAN KLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
