Cases 31 - 40 of 4,123
Rojas v. Kroger Texas LP
as 3:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Hope Rojas
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Strohmer v. The Kroger Company
as 2:2024cv10921
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Strohmer and Daniel Noveck
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ewin v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Tywaska Ewin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Honeycutt v. Kroger Texas, LP
as 3:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mable Honeycutt
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kraselsky v. Kroger Food Company
as 1:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Steve A. Kraselsky
Defendant:
Kroger Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Barrientes v. Kroger Texas L.P.
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Yvette Barrientes
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Marco Display Specialists, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Yvette Barrientes
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Marco Display Specialists, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Baker v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
as 4:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Collins Baker
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Triplett v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Donna Triplett
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
