Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 550
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02839
Plaintiff: Tony L. Hill
Defendant: J Pay LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Hester We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv02828
Plaintiff: Tony L. Hill
Defendant: Roger Hester, Zephyrhills C.I. and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv24027
Plaintiff: Tony L. Hill
Defendant: J Pay, LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HILL et al
as 2:2022cv04486
Plaintiff: ERIC LEWIS
Defendant: ANTHONY L. HILL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Hill, Sr. v. Spaulding We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01764
Petitioner: Thomas L. Hill, Sr.
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Nathan Hill
as 22-2196
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN L. HILL
United States of America v. Hill
as 22-1102
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Thomas L. Hill, Sr., AKA T
John Hill v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant: John L. Hill
Defendant / Appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff: Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant: United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00246
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?