Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Bonner v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., et al
as 3:2010cv00611
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Bonner
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.,, Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.,, Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bonner v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Bonner
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bonner v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Bonner
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Timothy O'Brien , Bryan M. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shelton v. Lemons et al
as 4:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Shelton
Defendant:
Michael Lemons, Brenda J Hough, John Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Anderson v. Rozel Hollingsworth
as 09-5808
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROZEL L. HOLLINGSWORTH, Chief U.S. Probation Officer
Anderson v. Hollingsworth
as 2:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
William E. Anderson
Respondent:
Rozel L. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Hollingsworth et al
as 1:2008cv00177
Petitioner:
William E Anderson
Respondent:
Rozel L Hollingsworth and Probation Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: Gregory Hollingsworth
as 08-6204
Movant:
In re: GREGORY L. HOLLINGSWORTH
Respondent:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Hollingsworth v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02338
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, George Little, Lucy Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Piper v. E L Hollingsworth and Company
as 2:2008cv11610
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Piper
Defendant:
E L Hollingsworth and Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
