Cases 31 - 40 of 84
USA v. George Vasquez
as 15-10833
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE VASQUEZ, also known as George Luis Vasquez
Luis Vasquez v. Superior Court of the State of California
as 5:2015cv01550
Respondent:
Superior Court of the State of California
Petitioner:
Luis Vasquez
Vasquez v. Mapes et al
as 4:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Jill Dursky, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Corporate Transportation Group
as 15-88
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mazhar Saleem, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jagjit Singh, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Anjum Ali and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corporate Transportation Group, Ltd., Corporate Transportation Group International, Corporate Transportation Group Worldwide, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Secretary of Labor, National Employment Law Project, National Employment Lawyers Association and others
Vera v. Super Pollo Rest. Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05788
Defendant:
Super Pollo Rest. Inc., Julio Vasquez and Luis Vasquez
Plaintiff:
Mario Vera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vasquez, Jr. v. King City et al
as 5:2014cv04220
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Vasquez, Jr.
Defendant:
King City, Nick Baldiviez and Brennan Lux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv09127
Plaintiff:
Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
John Doe, Williams and Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Elvis Mosquera-Valoi
as 13-20733
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELVIS MARINO MOSQUERA-VALOIS, also known as Jose Luis Vasquez, also known as Wilbert Rodriguez Sejuelas, also known as Wilbert R Sejuelas, also known as Elvis Marino Mosquera, also known as Wilbert Rodriguez-Sejuelas, also known as Jose L. Vasquez, also k
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
