Cases 31 - 40 of 3,498
Lyons-Price v. Boring
as 5:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lyons-Price
Defendant:
Kylee Boring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Harris
Defendant:
W. Holzapfel, K. Heckard and D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sigmon v. Musk
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Sigmon
Defendant:
Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cofield et al v. Antero Resources Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cofield and Karen A. Cofield
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation, David I. Beem, Tyrone L. Beem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pugh v. Coleman et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ethan Pugh
Defendant:
Michael Sean Coleman, April Riley, Steven Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brown v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Warden W. Holzapfel, Dr. Edwards, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00610
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Harris
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-055.500 et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-055.500, Michael P. Otte and Denise A. Otte
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
