Cases 31 - 40 of 111
David Meyers v. Leslie Fleming
as 21-7514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
LESLIE FLEMING, Eastern Regional Administrator, MARCUS ELAM, VADOC Eastern Regional Administrator, BRIAN SCHUYLER, PREA Analyst and others
McNeal v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2021cv03431
Plaintiff:
Timothy McNeal
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, Mr. C. Nevils, Mr. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Harvey Spencer
as 21-7470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HARVEY SPENCER, Chief Secretary, MARCUS ELAM, VADOC Eastern Regional Administrator, G. HOLLOWAY, VADOC Eastern Regional Ombudsman and others
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. Durham Co. Detention Facility
as 21-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, /Dental Dept., MS. SLADE and others
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Department of Corrections, Capt Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Sapp et al
as 3:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Tyrone F. Hines
Defendant:
B. Sapp, M. Ortiz and Ms. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Spencer et al
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, L. Mabrey, Dr. Eric Van Buskirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Wethington et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, Ms. Ansar, Dr. Eric Van Buskirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
