Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Manuel Reyes-Pena v. Chief Commander of the United
as 15-14433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL RAUL REYES-PENA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF COMMANDER OF THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Manuel Reyes-Pena v. Chief Commander of the United, et al
as 14-2918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL RAUL REYES-PENA, also known as MANUEL RAUL REYES-PENA GARCIA MONTERO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF COMMANDER OF THE UNITED STATES, VICE PRESIDENT and GOVERNMENTS OF STATES
Reyes Pena v. Chief Commander of the United States
as 8:2014cv01823
Plaintiff:
Manuel Raul Reyes Pena
Defendant:
Chief Commander of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Reyes v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez-Reyes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson et al v. Interactive Marketing Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03303
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson , LeMarcus Owens , Manuel A. Reyes and others
Defendant:
Interactive Marketing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maria Reyes-Ortiz, et al v. Efron
as 14-1138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIA M. REYES-ORTIZ, MARLENYS VARGAS-REYES, M.K.O.V. and others
Defendant:
HIMA SAN PABLO-BAYAMON, d/b/a Hospital San Pablo, Inc., ARTURO DIAZ-VAZQUEZ, RAMON A. SUAREZ-VILLAMIL and others
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID EFRON
Galaviz-Reyes v. USA
as 6:2013cv01461
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel Galaviz-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Manuel Martinez-Reye
as 13-41297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL MARTINEZ-REYES, also known as Manuel Reyes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
