Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Richard Ramirez v. Grover
as 14-55099
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD MARIO RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GROVER
Richard Ramirez v. Grover
as 13-57070
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD MARIO RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GROVER
Charles Wideman v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
as 13-17452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WIDEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, in its official and municipal capacity, CITY OF MORGAN HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its official and municipal capacity, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, in its municipal capacity and others
Ramirez-Martinez v. USA
as 2:2013cv02395
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Ramirez-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vazquez et al v. Ame LLC et al
as 1:2013cv06477
Plaintiff:
Amado Vazquez and Mario Ramirez
Defendant:
Ame LLC and Jason Chan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Marcelino Claro
as 13-50417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCELINO CASTRO CLAROS, AKA Marcelino Castro, AKA Marsleno Castro, AKA Masalino Castro, AKA Marcelino Castro-Ramirez, AKA Marcelino Claros, AKA Marcel Greey, AKA Aldo Leyva, AKA Aldo C. Leyva, AKA Aldo Caro Leyva, AKA Jose Mario Ramirez, AKA Jose Mario Z
Ramirez, et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 5:2013cv00322
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Heidi Ramirez and Mario Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
RAMIREZ et al v. SEQUOIA LANDSCAPING et al
as 2:2013cv01827
Plaintiff:
MARIO RAMIREZ , LUDVIN SALGUERO , GIAN CARLO SALAZAR and others
Defendant:
SEQUOIA LANDSCAPING and DONALD R. BRINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Juan Ramirez-Cruz
as 13-50234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MARIO RAMIREZ-CRUZ
Mario Ramirez Villegas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70935
Petitioner:
MARIO RAMIREZ VILLEGAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
