Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Southern California Investors Inc v. Marlana J Smith et al
as 5:2013cv00836
Defendant:
Marlana J Smith and Martha Jean Smith
Plaintiff:
Southern California Investors Inc
ISR Group, Inc. v. Comereski
as 1:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
ISR Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Comereski
Miscellaneou:
Martha S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ISR Group, Inc. v. Sharp
as 1:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
ISR Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Sharp
Miscellaneou:
Martha S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ISR Group, Inc. v. Manhattan Partners et al
as 1:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
ISR Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Manhattan Partners , Academi LLC and Martha S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP v. Marlana J Smith et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Defendant:
Data West Inc, Does, Marlana J Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP v. Marlana J Smith et al
as 5:2012cv02042
Defendant:
Data West Inc, Does, Marlana J Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP
John Townsend v. Sarah Cooper, et al
as 12-3620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, WILLIAM SWIEKATOWSKI, MARK ZIMONICK and others
Smith v. Gilbert et al
as 6:2012cv02936
Plaintiff:
Martha Jane Smith
Defendant:
Dawn Gilbert, Ann Jackson, Elisabeth Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP v. Marlana J Smith et al
as 5:2012cv01235
Defendant:
Data West Inc, Does, Marlana J Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Southern California REO Housing Fund LP
Betty M Swift et al v. United States of America
as 8:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
Henry Klein, Norma Jean Marshall Klein, Janet M Marshall and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
