Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Davies v. Benov
as 1:2015at00139
Petitioner: Matthew Rowan Davies
Respondent: Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Davies v. Benov We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00275
Defendant: Benov
Plaintiff: (HC) Davies
Petitioner: Matthew Rowan Davies
Respondent: Warden Michael Benov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00440
Plaintiff: Matthew B Davis
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00685
Plaintiff: Marilyn B Davis and Matthew J Davis
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv01083
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner: Matthew Allean Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02117
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GE Business Financial Services Inc. v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00988
Plaintiff: GE Business Financial Services Inc.
Defendant: Mark E. Davis, Mark Mitchell Davis , Martin E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Davis v. Rivard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv14616
Petitioner: Matthew Brooke Davis
Defendant: Steven Rivard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02994
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Matthew Davis v. Steven Richard, et al
as 09-3191
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW A. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN RICHARD, JERRY WITTHOFT and JOHN CARTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?