Cases 31 - 40 of 382
Matthew DecIn re: Matthew Dec
as 23-1244
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW P. DEC
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA Attorney General, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PA Chief Counsel Office, PennDOT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Vyletel v. University of Michigan - Dearborn et al
as 2:2022cv13067
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan - Dearborn, Eric Kirklin, Shawn Simone and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DEC v. BUTLER PA. COMMISSIONER AND SOLICITOR et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
BUTLER PA. COMMISSIONER AND SOLICITOR, BUTLER PA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ATT. BENJAMIN LEVINNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WEALER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P WEALER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vyletel v. University of Michigan - Dearborn
as 2:2022cv12744
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan - Dearborn
Autio v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Autio
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amin et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Susan A Sangiorgio, Ephraim Vashovsky, Learan Kahanov and others
Defendant:
Republic of Iran Islamic and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Vyletel v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv12485
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan and University of Michigan, Regents of
DEC v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC and Matthew Paul Dec, I
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENN DOT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
