Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 31 - 40 of 400
Matthews v. USA
as 3:2023cv01199
Petitioner: John Matthews
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01187
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fusco et al v. McLean et al
as 3:2023cv01140
Plaintiff: David Fusco and Matthew Fusco
Defendant: GEORGE MCLEAN and Yarmouth Lumber, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff: Gregory Johnson
Defendant: Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antar v. Lodice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01021
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Matthew J. Lodice, Scott Lodice, Karen Bowers and others
Amicus Curiae: Esq Lizelle Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Lodice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00983
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Matthew J. Lodice
Amicus Curiae: Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00985
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Antar v. Lodice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff: Theodora F. Antar
Defendant: Matthew J. Lodice and Esq Lizelle Martin
Pascarella v. Ten-Ex, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff: Averardo P. Pascarella
Defendant: Ten-Ex, Inc., Ten-Ex Commercial Real Estate, Samatha Corbat and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?