Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Bonilla v. Santa Clara County et al
as 4:2021cv02809
Defendant:
Judge Joshua Weinstein, Judge Linda R. Clark, Judge Greffon S. Greffon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Jividen et al
as 2:2021cv00250
Defendant:
CHP Tuney, Kim Thacker, AWS Frame and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders and Quauntel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv03730
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
SHANEE MCKENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonilla v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv01452
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Nishigaya, Judge Deborah Q. Ryan, Judge Joshua Weinstein and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17006
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCKENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKINNEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19583
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCKINNEY and THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH MCKENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
