Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Buckman v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2014cv03014
Petitioner:
Herman D. Buckman
Respondent:
Michael Kenney, Diane Sabatka-Rhine and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leon v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2014cv00016
Respondent:
Michael Kenney, Diane Sabatka-Rhine and State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Ira R. Leon
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Kenney et al
as 4:2013cv03215
Petitioner:
Todd L. Cook
Respondent:
Michael Kenney and Diane Sabatka-Rine
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenney v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv03722
Plaintiff:
L. Michael Kenney
Defendant:
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Indian Inmates of the Nebraska Penitentiary v. Wolff
as 4:1972cv00156
Defendant:
Les Auman, Harold W. Clarke, Michael Kenney and others
Plaintiff:
Indian Inmates of the Nebraska Penitentiary and Richard Thomas Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEY v. CURRAN FROM HOLD COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2010cv05585
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL KENNEY
Defendant:
CURRAN FROM HOLD COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEY v. TRINITY SERVICE GROUP INC
as 3:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNEY
Defendant:
TRINITY SERVICE GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malcom v. Houston
as 4:2004cv03243
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke, Robert Houston and Michael Kenney
402) 444-6787 (fax:
Jeffrey J. Lux
Petitioner:
Arven Malcom, Jr.
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
402) 471-3591 (fax:
Kevin J. Slimp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
