Cases 31 - 40 of 46
McIntosh v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2016cv00927
Plaintiff:
Michael McIntosh
Defendant:
C Lindsey and Sergeant Herman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabor et al v. Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2016cv01587
Plaintiff:
Ray Tabor , Michelle McLean and Bridget Tabor
Defendant:
Adams County, Colorado, Corizon Health, Inc., Michael McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Adams County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2016cv00574
Plaintiff:
Marquise Demont Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriffs Department, Michael McIntosh, Michael (I) McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. McIntosh et al
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Adrian Brown
Defendant:
Michael McIntosh, Brett Eskam, Lunn Trail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Adams County Sheriffs Department, et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Marquise Demont Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriffs Department, Adams County Sheriffs Department (I), Michael McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grider v. Zito et al
as 1:2015cv02238
Plaintiff:
Allen Grider
Defendant:
Michael McIntosh , Steven Zito and Steven Zito (I)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeter v. Wiley et al
as 1:2014cv02724
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jeter
Defendant:
Wiley, Hana Tise, Kusiwagi Yaeko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTOSH v. BROWN et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, CORIZON and THERESA LITTLEJOHN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCINTOSH
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00608
Defendant:
Police Officer Jamar Goddard and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Michael McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCINTOSH v. USA
as 2:2013cv00607
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KEVIN MICHAEL MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
