Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Rodriguez v. 1144 Ocean Drive, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv23993
Plaintiff:
Michel Rodriguez
Defendant:
1144 Ocean Drive, LLC and Stefano Frittella
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Mehmood v. Garcia et al
as 2:2015cv01995
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, US Postal Inspector Michael Chavez, Judge Claire and others
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mehmood v. Brennan et al
as 2:2015cv01739
Respondent:
Judge Brennan, AUSA Heiko Cuppola, Judge Dale A. Drozd and others
Petitioner:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mehmood v. Chavez et al
as 2:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Michael Chavez, United States of America, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. John J Martin Jr. M.D., P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv23222
Plaintiff:
Michelle Rodriguez
Defendant:
John J Martin Jr. M.D., P.A. and Ivone Sais
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Rodriguez v. Mercury Casualty Company
as 2:2013cv01091
Defendant:
Mercury Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Michele Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-14134
Plaintiff:
Pauline Michelle Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14134
Plaintiff:
Pauline Michelle Rodriguez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Trump Marks Real Estate LLC. v. Cap Cana S.A. et al
as 1:2012cv06440
Plaintiff:
Trump Marks Real Estate LLC.
Defendant:
Cap Cana S.A. , Ricardo Hazoury , Fernando Hazoury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
