Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fareed v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Association, Ebony Weathers, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Akram Ibin Fareed and Akram Fareed-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Montgomery County Commission et al
as 5:2018cv01501
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Revenue, Steve Marshall, John Merrill and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wells v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 7:2018cv00841
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Lashon Wells
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, State of Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Robinson Miller
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wells v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Lashon Wells
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, State of Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery County, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00381
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
