Cases 31 - 40 of 114
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2021cv00580
Plaintiff:
Toni Davis
Defendant:
Bottomley Enterprises, Inc., Junior R. Murray and BOTTOMLEY ENTERPRISES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS v. FORQUER et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Defendant:
MURRAY, MICHELLE, BRANDY LEEK and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY W. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00398
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Murray
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FORTE v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00546
Defendant:
MURRAY, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FORTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00500
Plaintiff:
BRICE PRICE
Defendant:
DEARDORFF, DEE, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Mery Beth Bonaventura, Indiana Department of Child Services Workers, Suntana L Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADISH v. EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2020cv00108
Defendant:
DREW MURRAY and THE CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS GLADISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL DEMOLITION GROUP, LLC v. MURRAY
as 1:2019cv04086
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEMOLITION GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH KYLE MURRAY
FREDERICK et al v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2019cv01959
Plaintiff:
MARY J FREDERICK, WILLIAM L MARKS, JR., JOHN JUSTIN COLLIER and others
Defendant:
M CATHERINE FINELLO, CONNIE LAWSON, RITA L GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
