Cases 31 - 40 of 352
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joshua N. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. APM STAFF et al
as 2:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
NASHAE N. SMITH
Defendant:
APM STAFF, ASOCIACION PAERTORRIQUENOS EN MARCHA, NILDA RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MARTINO
as 2:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
NASHAE N. SMITH
Defendant:
ANDRE MARTINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. EVERETT
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
NASHAE N. SMITH
Defendant:
CYNTHIA EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01264
Plaintiff:
Alicia N. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SLO-MLP, L.P. et al v. MEMORIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82071
Plaintiff:
SLO-MLP, L.P., Douglas and Nina Katsev Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2008 and Patrick N. Smith 2004 Living Trust dated October 7, 2004
Defendant:
MEMORIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Charles Everhardt and EF Trust, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38909
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN N SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
