Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Nathaniel Williams v. Darren Spiece, et al
as 21-15800
Defendant / Appellee:
SANCHEZ, JOSEPH LEWIS, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Valencia v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Richardson Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams v. Yup et al
as 3:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Beverly, Tara Carpenter, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 3:2021cv10749
Defendant:
Matthew Hagerty, Gilbert Carlson, Bethany M Smith, City Attorney, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
Yellow House LLC, Accrual Investments LLC, 1604 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01458
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN MCCOY
Defendant:
OFFICER FRANK RUFFIN, Officer JAMES CLARK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ward et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
M. Ward, Tara Carpenter, Muse and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Williams
as 0:2020cv02653
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Nathaniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245
BURKEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99155
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAM BURKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97502
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
