Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Miller v. NFI Industries, Inc.
as 1:2012cv09905
Plaintiff:
James R. Miller
Defendant:
NFI Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
PJC Logistics LLC v. A. Duie Pyle Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv02549
Plaintiff:
PJC Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Eastern Freight Ways Inc. , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. , USA Truck LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Great American Lines Inc. , New Penn Motor Express Inc. , NFI Industries Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
PJC Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv04360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PJC Logistics LLC v. A. Duie Pyle Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
PJC Logistics LLC
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle Inc., AmeriQuest Transportation Services Inc., Auscor Transportation Services and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
FIELDS v. SATINSKY et al
as 2:2010cv02254
Plaintiff:
SHARON FIELDS
Defendant:
VINCENT A. SATINSKY and NFI INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. NFI Industries Inc et al
as 2:2009cv03298
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Smith
Defendant:
NFI Industries Inc and National Distribution Center LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
