Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01454
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gevas et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2018cv06556
Defendant:
George Adamson, Troy A. Dunlop, William M. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
David C. Gevas and Marcia Gevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Brown v. Daniel Paramo
as 2:2017cv09220
Petitioner:
Nicholas Brown
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Mack et al v. Transatlantic Lines LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01101
Plaintiff:
Adrian Mack , Nicholas Brown , Arthur Cucchiaro and others
Defendant:
Transatlantic Lines LLC , Transatlantic Lines Ship Holdings, Inc , Transatlantic Ship Holdings II, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
MV Geysir , Transatlantic Ship Holdings II, Inc. , Transatlantic Lines Ship Holdings, Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
Nicholas Brown , Brandon Crouse , Angelo Crudo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Brown v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brown
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. COHEN et al
as 1:2017cv03436
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
COHEN, TAYLOR and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Andrew v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 16-16433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD ANDREW
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, UTZIE, Warden of Security, Jackson State Prison and others
Brown v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05827
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brown
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nicholas Brown v. Joseph Davis
as 15-14280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH DAVIS
Karanjulian v. Peck et al
as 3:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Minas Karanjulian
Defendant:
Dana Peck and Nicholas Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
