Cases 31 - 40 of 56
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
as 2:2022md03034
In Re:
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, American Honda Motor Co Inc, Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Special Master:
Scott Woloson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NEO Wireless, LLC v. Nissan North America Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00220
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptnce Corporation, Nissan North America Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NEO Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NEO Wireless, LLC v. Nissan North America Inc. et al
as TNM/3:22-CV-00220
Plaintiff:
NEO Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Nissan North America Inc, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan North America Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Minton v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Darrell Minton
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
