Cases 31 - 40 of 532
O'NEILL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02344
Plaintiff:
GEORGANNA O'NEILL and LINDA MONROE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neill v. Great Northern Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
Ellen O'Neill
Defendant:
Great Northern Insurance Company and Chubb & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRIEND EL-BEY v. DAVENPORT et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
JONATHON LARON FRIEND EL-BEY
Defendant:
PATRICK A. DAVENPORT, SUSAN S. FRYE, JAMES R. O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Michael Stapleton Associates Ltd
as 1:2018cv00936
Plaintiff:
Phillip Blackmon , Juan Gomez , Zahir Mohammed and others
Defendant:
Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd. and Michael O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'Neill v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00751
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
O'Neill v. Speedster Services, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jake O'Neill
Defendant:
Speedster Services, LLC , Shailesh C. Patel and Mamta S. Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perkins v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective John Doe 1, Detective John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Lewayne Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 1:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warr v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2018cv00579
Petitioner:
Lydia Warr
Respondent:
James O'Neill and Steven Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffis v. Howard et al
as 3:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Doyce Dean Griffis
Defendant:
Marcia Morales Howard, Robert E. O'Neill, D. Rodney Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
