Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Mortazavi v. Samford University et al
as 2:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Massoud Mortazavi
Defendant:
Samford University, Andrew Westmoreland and Wayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tillman v. Pittman et al
as 1:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Albert Tillman
Defendant:
Jason Pittman and Schneider National Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holiday v. Crushink et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jerome Holiday
Defendant:
CO Crushink, Sgt. Wiggins, J. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Spangler v. Pittman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00844
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
T. Pittman , Officer Bouier , Lt. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Officer Salter , Officer Dudley, Nurse Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Tom Parker
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roy S. Moore
Defendant:
Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama , Billy C. Bedsole , David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Cardaryl Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Allen, Billy Beasley, Scott Beason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Vance, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Robert S. Vance, Jr. , Anne-Marie Adams , J. Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
