Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02268
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
In re: Jair Ramirez
as 26-2816
Petitioner:
In re: JAIR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, BRIAN MCSHANE, Field Office Director U.S. ICE Philadelphia Office, PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04282
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
as 26-2125
Petitioner:
ALBERTO JOSE RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Ramirez v. Patterson (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00603
Plaintiff:
David Ramirez
Defendant:
Selena Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
