Cases 31 - 40 of 368
Jennings v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randal Jennings
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, Taylor, Poynor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Paschall v. Bryan et al
as 5:2022cv05043
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Paschall, Mary Paschall and A. & B. Paschall
Defendant:
Elizabeth Storey Bryan, Craig Williams, Attorney Hadley Hindmarsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balentine v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Todd Watson, Rob Ratten and Randall Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balentine v. Watson et al
as 5:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Jamall Balentine
Defendant:
Attorney Todd Watson, Judge Rob Ratten and Deputy Prosecutor Randall Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder et al v. Bid Group Construction US Inc
as 4:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Holder and Randall Taylor
Defendant:
Bid Group Construction US Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Lay et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson and Arkansas Board of Correction
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Michael Richardson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Lay et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wendy Kelley, Arkansas Board of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goyette v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Randall Goyette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvin v. Randall et al
as 4:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Derrick Hammond, Terry Coleman, Rita Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Gerry Calvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
