Cases 31 - 40 of 209
Reich v. North Carolina Attorney General
as 1:2021cv00083
Petitioner:
Scott Randall Reich
Respondent:
North Carolina Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baxter v. Neal et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Baxter
Defendant:
Chuck Lee, Randall Lee Neal, Sr., Brian Matthew Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Sophia Feaster, M. Dula, Amy Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Randall Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Owens
as 1:2021cv00023
Respondent:
Barney Owens
Petitioner:
Jeremy Michael Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03021
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins Wilson, Byron McNeely, Kenneth Leonard Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. PAGE et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
CARLYLE SHERRILL, ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GLORIA L. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Page et al
as 3:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Carlyle Sherrill, Rowan County District Attorneys Office, Gloria L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTER v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, THE et al
as 1:2020cv01050
Defendant:
LAURA MILLER, SARA KIMIKO SUZUKI-MCGIRR, ALAN JONES and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK C. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
First National Bank of Pennsylvania et al v. Independence Lumber, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Independence Lumber, Inc. and J. Randall Eller
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Pennsylvania and Bank Capital Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
SIZEMORE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00696
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SIZEMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
