Cases 31 - 40 of 50
ACE European Group Limited v. Nolan Mitchell Ransdell et al
as 2:2014cv03721
Plaintiff:
ACE European Group Limited
Defendant:
Does, Nolan Mitchell Ransdell and Amanda Lee Wasvary-Ransdell
Black v. Hathaway et al
as 5:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
Harold Joe Black
Defendant:
Don Hathaway, Allen Harris, Hornsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Texas Industries Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00740
Plaintiff:
Maxine Phillips
Defendant:
Texas Industries Inc, Thomas R Ransdell, Mel G Brekhus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Ransdell v. NCB Management Services, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Lewis Ransdell
Defendant:
Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ransdell v. United Recovery Systems, L.P. (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ransdell
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ransdell v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ransdell
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc. and GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Generali - U.S. Branch v. Las Plazas Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv21113
Plaintiff:
Generali - U.S. Branch
Defendant:
Las Plazas Investments, LLC and Jeffrey Ransdell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Norwood IV v. Bourbon County Government et al
as 5:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
William M. Norwood IV
Defendant:
Bourbon County Government, John S. Ransdell, Gregory Kapusta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
