Cases 31 - 40 of 50
ATES v. ARNOLD et al
as 5:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
CASEY ATES
Defendant:
IRIS ARNOLD, KEY MCGUIRE, ROBERT KELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shati v. Keller et al
as 2:2011cv04843
Defendant:
Robert Keller and Lola Quesada
Plaintiff:
Shati Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2011cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Veondi Parks
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, L. Gale Buckner, Robert Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Joseph Reisinger v. City of Wilkes-Barre, et al
as 11-1519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH R. REISINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, THOMAS M. LEIGHTON, Mayor, City of Wilkes-Barre, FRANCIS KATZ, Plumbing Inspector, City of Wilkes-Barre, Code Enforcement Officer and others
Reisinger v. Leighton et al
as 3:2010cv02005
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Thomas Leighton, Francis Kratz, Fred Pape and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Donald et al
as 1:2010cv01726
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
James Donald, Robert Keller, Garland R. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.K. et al v. Lake Oswego School District
as 3:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
B. K., Robert Keller and Cynthia Mohiuddin
Defendant:
Lake Oswego School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
Robert Keller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
