Cases 31 - 40 of 10,568
Dillihunt et al v. Seths Amusement Park et al
as 2:2024cv09407
Defendant:
Christopher Abbey, Seth Anderson, Seths Amusement Park and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero-Puentes et al v. Gargiulo, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Teresita De Jesus Gutierrez-Bahumea, Antonio Maldonado-Villa, Gustavo Hernandez-Valladares and others
Defendant:
Gargiulo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Duran De La Rosa v. Garland
as 24-2858
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
WANDER DURAN DE LA ROSA
Mario Rosas v. FCI Lompoc II
as 2:2024cv09364
Respondent:
FCI Lompoc II
Petitioner:
Mario Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosa v. Gonzalez
as 3:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosa
Defendant:
Noel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. De La Rosa et al
as 1:2024cv04869
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez Aguilar and Gilberto Estrada Garcia
Defendant:
Jose Luis Dorrego De La Rosa and Donny & Pippo Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chak v. New York State Department of Education
as 24-2823
Defendant:
Dr. BETTY A. ROSA, Commissioner of New York State Education Department, JANET MAXWELL WICKETT, SHARON L. VELTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
VANDANA CHAK
Rosas-Garcia, et al v. Garland
as 24-9567
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE, RAFAEL PICO-GARCIA and DEISY ERNESTINA ROSAS-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Ruben Gil et al v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Ruben Gil and Rosa Gil
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
