Cases 31 - 40 of 57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SWARTZ et al
as 3:2014mc00038
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL L. SWARTZ
Garnishee:
RENZENBERGER
Roderick Wright, et al v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 14-55944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK WRIGHT, FERNANDO OLIVAREZ and MARCUS HAYNES, Jr., On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
RENZENBERGER, INC., a Kansas corporation
Roderick Wright, et al v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 14-80054
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
RODERICK WRIGHT, individuals on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, FERNANDO OLIVAREZ and MARCUS HAYNES, Jr.
Defendant - Respondent:
RENZENBERGER, INC., a Kansas corporation
Roderick Wright et al v. Renzenberger, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06642
Defendant:
Does, Lawrence Purnell and Renzenberger, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcus Haynes, Jr., Fernando Olivarez and Roderick Wright
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-50145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2012cv02447
Plaintiff:
Ivory L. Williams
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Renzenberger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wooten et al v. Renzenberger, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00411
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Wooten , Cassie Powers and Brian Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calatrello v. Renzenberger, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00208
Petitioner:
Frederick J. Calatrello
Respondent:
Renzenberger, Inc. and Local 707, Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, affiliated with the National Production Workers Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
