Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Shelton et al v. Gourmet Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04206
Plaintiff: Kimberly Shelton , Detondra Thomas , Gregory Brantley and others
Defendant: Gourmet Services, Inc., Gourmet Services Management Group, LLC, Nathaniel R. Goldston and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jones #364868 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00363
Plaintiff: Samuel Roosevelt Jones #364868
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Paul Eyke, Mandi Salmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
JONES v. USA
as 3:2011cv00156
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ROOSEVELT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones #364868 v. Caruso et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00812
Plaintiff: Samuel Roosevelt Jones #364868
Defendant: Patricia L. Caruso, Mary Berghuis, L. Strand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69603
Plaintiff: ROOSEVELT JONES, JR, ROOSEVELT JONES, JR, ROOSEVELT JONES, JR and others
Defendant: CELOTEX CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JONES et al v. OLIN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv73742
Plaintiff: JOHNNIE MAE JONES and ROOSEVELT JONES, JR
Defendant: OLIN CORPORATION, ACANDS INC, INC EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lonnie Roosevelt Jones v J L Norwood
as 2:2007cv02736
Petitioner: Lonnie Roosevelt Jones
Respondent: J L Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?