Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Gonzalez v. Edwards et al
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Gonzalez
Defendant:
Scott Edwards and Washoe County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott Weiss v. Guy Bosch
as 22-1416
Petitioner / Appellant:
Scott Edward Weiss
Respondent / Appellee:
Guy Bosch
Weiss v. Bosh
as 0:2021cv02409
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Weiss
Respondent:
Guy Bosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHANNON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03243
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EDWARD CHANNON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02577
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EDWARD COOPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charlene Bynum v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, et al
as 21-16254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLENE BYNUM, individually as the wife of and as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of Ronald Bynum
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, JACOB RAY, P#1886, RODRIGO DELARA, P#2417 and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, MICHELLE FREEDNAN, JOSHUA LOPER and others
BUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34594
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EDWARD BUTLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houlton v. Bohon
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Randall Houlton
Defendant:
Scott Edward Bohon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18349
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT EDWARD FOOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ickes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00432
Plaintiff:
Scott Edward Ickes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
