Cases 31 - 40 of 484
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Hicks
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ward
Defendant:
Harold Copenhaver, Larry Rogers, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Stephens v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Angela Stephens
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Syngenta Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Willis v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Willis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Otts et al
as 6:2022cv06095
Plaintiff:
Virgil Clayborn Shelton, Jr
Defendant:
Otts, Officer Martin, Deputy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Otts et al
as 4:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Virgil Clayborn Shelton, Jr
Defendant:
Otts, Martin, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kesterson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Stephen E Kesterson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanders v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2022cv06064
Plaintiff:
Jay Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Deputy US Marshal Issac Rodriguez, Investigator Allen Constant, Chief Deputy Stephen Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
